GrodsCorp

Iain; Hall sinks to new low

Monday 26 November 2007, 3:15 pm

John Surname

Categories: Blogosphere, Bogans

Tags: BridgitGread, IainHall, lying-liar-who-lies, trolls

Many of us have said that Iain; Hall couldn’t sink much lower - now he has.

Not just content on creating a ridiculous fake Bridgit Gread blog and then denying it, he is now linking to the fake blog from his own blog posts to try and make it look like it’s actually hers.

Oh, the transparency.

Iain has lost every argument he’s ever had with Bridgit, and now the only way he can discredit her is with a fake blog full of made-up crap - unlike IainHall.com which features only the facts.

And there is also this, in case you needed any more proof that Iain created the page.

Update: Iain continues to deny the page is his:

It should also be noted that the blog has posts in it that date back as far as october (sic) 2005, some time before I even began blogging.

Because it’s not like you can’t backdate posts.

To quote The Ed - Iain is a lying liar who lies.

75 Comments

Bridgit Gread (Monday 26 November 2007, 3:41 pm) #

I’m not sure what’s funnier: poor widdle Iain resorting to this vexacious mimickry because he’s got nothing in his armoury - or the fact he thinks anyone is stupid enough to buy it.
Bridgit Gread (Monday 26 November 2007, 4:01 pm) #

PS. Thanks Ed for amending my bio on the ‘Meet the Grods’ team page to explain Iain;Hall’s kindergarten antics.
Jimmy Scullin (Monday 26 November 2007, 4:14 pm) #

Iain; Hall = intellectual giant.
The Happy Revolutionary (Monday 26 November 2007, 5:08 pm) #

But in fairness to Iain; Hall, think of the advantages of this fake site. He has plenty of straw Islamofascistleftistlebsos to refute, and he gets lots of free links for his intellectual wilderness of a blog. It’s a win-win situation for Hall and his sockpuppet.
Jeremy (Monday 26 November 2007, 6:02 pm) #

Imagine how Iain Hall would feel if someone created a fake Iain Hall site in order to embarrass him.

It could be an exact copy of his existing site. No changes required.
Iain Hall (Monday 26 November 2007, 7:15 pm) #

You lot are just so amusing, firstly John claims that the “ED” attack page is factual when it can’t even get uncontentious things like the name of my first blog right,( Hint it was called “Being Nice” and Not “I am being nice”)The rest of it is no better now if someone tries to correct the errors of fact they are quickly banned.
I link to the Bridgit Gread blog because she seems intent on carrying on a vendetta against me and as she has the same posts there and here It strikes me as a better proposition to link there and not give Grods the traffic.
Finally how does that search for http://bridgit-gread.blogspot.com/ prove anything apart from there being links from this blog and mine to the page in question?
Jeremy (Monday 26 November 2007, 7:35 pm) #

Shameless.
The Happy Revolutionary (Monday 26 November 2007, 7:40 pm) #

Hall,

It’s obvious that you are the only person of the planet with the petty vindictiveness and blatant stupidity to churn out a site like the Bridgit one.
Everybody knows that Bridgit, like almost everybody on the planet, is no supporter of Hitler or anti-Semite. Only someone truly intellectually deformed would attribute such views to her. I nominate you as the only mental midget that fits the bill.
Bridgit Gread (Monday 26 November 2007, 10:14 pm) #

I notice that someone commented on this fake blog tonight as ‘Iain Hall’ - and the comment lasted all of an hour before being deleted. As you would expect, since the real Iain is hunkered over the controls like Dr Frankenstein.

Iain, you seem to be 51 going on 11. Your wife and kids must be so proud.
John Surname (Monday 26 November 2007, 10:25 pm) #

Iain’s trademarks litter the blog. Semi-colons, capital letters in the middle of sentences, cliches in talking marks, a picture at the top of the siderbar, homophobia, anti-feminist remarks…it goes on. Not to mention the fact that no-one in the blogosphere besides Iain has a beef with Bridgit.
Bruce (Monday 26 November 2007, 10:30 pm) #

I think he’s probably just enjoying the attention from this thread. He’s probably going to add it to TT&T.

Sad that someone could go through such contortions to prop up their self-esteem.
Krypto (Monday 26 November 2007, 11:05 pm) #

sad little man, sad sad little man.
Bridg, for what it’s worth I reckon you’d still look cute even in lederhosen, no one buys ;;;;’s shite, no one at all.
Ant Rogenous (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 12:57 pm) #

Hi Grods team, love the site. Also got a kick out of the IainHall.com entry: I’ve never seen such an awe-inspiring catalogue of sheer inanity.

Iain’s protest about it is particularly amusing:

if someone tries to correct the errors of fact they are quickly banned

“Someone”?
John Surname (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 1:42 pm) #

A quick look at the history shows Iain tried to significantly edit the article. You can witness the failure here.

In Iain’s words: “He succeeds more often than he fails at almost any endeavour, and yet is too humble enough to admit that made a mistake.”
John Surname (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 2:38 pm) #

Word for word from Iain’s blog:

“if they are seeking to come here for purely economic reasons then by any measure they are not “Refugee’s” nor are the “asylum seekers ” they re illegal; immigrants pure and simple.”

!!!!!!!!
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 3:14 pm) #

That one deserves to go to the pool room.
The Editor (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 3:20 pm) #

Jesus H. Christ. That is the purest gold nugget of Iain; Hall goodness I’ve ever seen.
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 3:29 pm) #

Is he pulling our leg? He can’t be serious.
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 3:30 pm) #

Oh my, it seems someone has placed it in the pool room.
Bridgit Gread (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 3:45 pm) #

Sound sound the semi-colon, fill the fife
Throughout the blogging world proclaim
One crowded para of Iain’s prose
Is like a turd by any name
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 3:56 pm) #

Iain may have changed his blog layout but you can’t polish turds.
Bridgit Gread (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 5:11 pm) #

LOL, now the hairy cretin is commenting at his own mimic-blog, as if he’s completely innocent of its origins. Oh and comments are now restricted to registered Blogspot bloggers.

Iain, matey, you must be crazier than a rabid cat if you think anyone here is buying what you’re selling. Exactly what is at the root of your mental issues - the remnants of an alcoholic past, or the male menopause?
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 5:23 pm) #

They say you are crazy if you talk to yourself then answer back and Iain has certainly answered himself back.

*I notice a fake iain has also posted there. I wonder if Iain will take the bait and delete the comment.
Iain Hall (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 7:57 pm) #

The indignation from all and sundry here is a pretty good indication that you lot are far more concerned than you pretend and when I last checked there is even a rather nasty threat from someone posting as “Bourbon Boy” that has been posted to Bridgit’s blog.
Perhaps people believe it after all. Which is why you are all being so nasty
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 8:05 pm) #

You took the bait Iain and changed the comment from the fake “Iain Hall” directing people to iainhall.com. I took a screen shot though.

As for your comment above, it’s the rambling of a madman. IT MAKES NO SENSE!

As for the threat from the supposed BB why don’t you put up the IP to prove it isn’t you? Because it has your fingerprints all over it.
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 8:08 pm) #

Holy moly! Someone (Iain) is posting as Bridget now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Iain, put down the crack pipe son. You sir are mentally defective.
Bridgit Gread (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 8:46 pm) #

Let him go, Jimmy, he’s well and truly flipped. Hopefully BB is back - he and Iain truly deserve each other.
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 9:27 pm) #

According to Iain, I am BB.
Bourbon Boy (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 9:51 pm) #

there is only one BB and thats me, I hope Hall remembers that because he has started a war and it will only end in tears (i.e. his.) if he wants to play this dirty-assed game then I say BRING IT ON
Bourbon Boy (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 9:52 pm) #

p.s. hallwatch updated, more to come later after i have slept off my jet lag
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 10:06 pm) #

Good to have you back BB. There’s lots of IH related material to catch up on. Iain will be shitting bricks right about now since he told everyone he stopped stopped blogging because of the threats YOU DIDN’T make to his kids.

Go figure. Fun times to be; had.
Jimmy Scullin (Tuesday 27 November 2007, 10:10 pm) #

Fuck, that’s meant to read he stopped YOU blogging…
Ray Dixon (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 1:45 am) #

I’ve only recently stumbled upon Mr Hall’s website and while I don’t particularly care for his brand of politics and social commentary I think he has a right to say it. I’m not sure what he’s done to all of you but the type of vilification I’m reading above is rarely justified. No one deserves that, especially when the comments (most of them) are made anonymously. Be fair and don’t sink to the level you claim Iain is at.
Jimmy Scullin (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 2:00 am) #

Ray, Ray, Ray. No one is trying to silence Iain Hall’s brand of politics or his right to comment on the working of the world we live in.

I notice how you have said:

I’ve only recently stumbled upon Mr Hall’s website

Okay. I will give you the benefit of the doubt because you are new to the scene and seem like a nice bloke. But Jesus Christ on a bike. Now I’ve seen it all. Prepare yourself for emails from Iain telling you how hard done by he is Ray. Don’t be like Malcolm and take on the poison chalice.

I’m not sure what he’s done to all of you but the type of vilification I’m reading above is rarely justified

Get a grip Ray. Failing that get the fuck over yourself. If I was you I’d be distancing myself from Iain like a thousand startled queers at a Boy George chain-against-the-wall party*.

*Notice homophobic paragraph.
Jimmy Scullin (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 2:10 am) #

I’m not sure what’s funnier: poor widdle Iain resorting to this vexacious mimickry because he’s got nothing in his armoury - or the fact he thinks anyone is stupid enough to buy it.

Ray is stupid enough to buy it. GOD HELP HIM!
Ray Dixon (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 2:58 am) #

I’m not “buying” anything Jimmy, I just don’t see the point of letting him get to you. I’m worried about those emails though - someone as “stupid” as me wouldn’t know how to delete them.
Bridgit Gread (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 5:52 am) #

Ray, it’s not by accident that so many people loathe Iain Hall - and his politics isn’t the rationale for this loathing either. Mr Hall has a long history of underhanded tricks, Internet sneakery and self-denial. You may wish to research some of it, but frankly it’s probably not worth the effort. Just watch your back when you’re around him.

I was in Bright just recently, it’s still a lovely place and I had a great time there. Good to see you are holding local government to account though; I’ve always thought it was a place of great potential but somewhat under-utilised.
Jimmy Scullin (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 11:29 am) #

I’m not sure what your point is now Ray since you have changed it. That’s the problem when you swan around all day dropping in on threads and giving your 2 cents worth without actually having a clue what you are talking about.
Ray Dixon (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 12:32 pm) #

Yeah it’s a problem dropping in on threads Jimmy, there’s always someone like you ready to pounce with illogical and deliberately provocative insults. Someone who acts as the sentinel, a sort-of barking dog to keep intruders away (unless of course the intruder agrees with your infantile snipings at an obviously deluded and probably harmless redneck from central Queensland!)

Bridgit, thanks for the warning but I don’t plan to be around Iain. Besides, I’m used to dealing with retrograde right-wing hillbillies & rednecks - I live in Bright! They’re all the same and it’s a piece of cake to deal with them because they’re totally illogical. Same goes for Jimmy.

As for “holding local government to account”, it’s a pity more people don’t focus on what’s going on in their own area right under their noses. It’s often a microcosm of the wider State, national & world problems and if more people got down to grass roots there’d be less problems everywhere. True activism starts from the ground up.
Krypto (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 12:55 pm) #

Trust me Ray, ian hall has dug his own pit, well and truly. The kinds of things you probably haven’t been privvy to are;
-ian hall attempting to have people fired from their jobs by contacting their employers with malicious slander (in at least one case getting the person’s identity wrong and pulling this rubbish on a completely innocent individual).
-ian hall using the blogging name of someone here to print pro nazi rubbish, attempting to implicate that person as a nazi supporter/ sympathyser.
-ian hall “trolling” ie going to sites he knows full well his political views will cause offence, inciting an argument and then threatening legal action for “defamation and slander”.
-offering all manner of enticements for people willing to “reveal the identity” of people on here and other sites who choose to comment anonymously (clearly this information would be used maliciously).
These are a few “highlights” of ian hall’s internet behaviour Ray. Certainly by no means a comprehensive list.
Ordinarily I would agree, the kind of sledging ian hall gets would be excessive, but not in this case, in any rate, if it bothered him, why would he turn up at all?
You’ll notice him listed as one of the top commentors on Grods.
Things are not always as they seem Ray.
Krypto (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 1:19 pm) #

Ray be a pal and post a link on your site to http://www.wodongaonlinetimes.com.au/
Not my site, but it is a good citizen journalism site for the electorate of Indi.
Nice town Bright too by the way, do they still have the Autumn festival?
Sophie Mirabella may become leader of the liberal party, they (the libs) often offer things like that to women MP’s as a poisoned chalice when they know it is impossible to do anything constructive with the position in it’s current form.
Jimmy Scullin (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 1:25 pm) #

You’re right Ray. It’s harmless starting a fake blog that paints someone as a neo-Nazi. No need to get your knickers in a knot though. I just need to have a good hard look at myself.
Ray Dixon (Wednesday 28 November 2007, 3:04 pm) #

Thanks for the run-down on Hall Krypto but I read most of that on the fake iainhall.com website after someone put the link into my site. I still think you’d be better off ignoring him.

Re W.O.T. I did have a link to Kieran’s site before he closed it down a few months ago but I see he’s started up again - now that the election is over - and is making political comment in hindsight. It’s a pity he didn’t do that during the campaign; it might have helped to get rid of Sophie or at least reduce the margin down to a winnable level for next time. I think he got cold feet, which is not surprising considering how many wimps there are around here. People in this area are generally frightened to speak up and are so used to getting next to nothing they daren’t complain in case the few crumbs are taken away too.

Yes, the Autumn is still the busiest time here in Bright. Sophie actually opened last year’s festival - standing on the back of a truck wearing a Dryzabone and an Akubra. No one else was.
Krypto (Thursday 29 November 2007, 1:26 pm) #

Ray I can say with absolute certainty that Kieren wasn’t suffering “cold feet”, it was more a matter that he was involved in a more direct sense with the outcome of the election in Indi, I suspect it was a matter of not being able to divide his time.
Certainly Ray the sensible and mature thing to do would be to ignore ;;; ;;;; as I like to call him, but where’s the fun in that?
Krypto (Thursday 29 November 2007, 1:37 pm) #

So Sophie gets around in the back of a truck now does she Ray? I guess it was inevitable given the crap she gorges her face with all day every day. It surprises me she was opposed to having the meatworks built near her place, think of the whole carcasses she could have delivered right to her door.
She’s going to have a demarcation dispute with her knees one of these days.
Bridgit Gread (Thursday 29 November 2007, 5:45 pm) #

It should also be noted that the blog has posts in it that date back as far as october (sic) 2005, some time before I even began blogging.

He’s already bent the truth about when his first blog started up, as well as his own age, so what’s a little date-tinkering amongst friends?
Iain Hall (Thursday 29 November 2007, 8:43 pm) #

Bridgit Gread complaining about anyone being dishonest is the greatest hoot of this otherwise pathetic thread

Trying’ to set you up? I did set you up - and you fell for it hook, line and sinker. The best retort you can come up with is that I’m dishonest; I am only dishonest with people like you and Hall, who thoroughly deserve to be taken for a ride. (Bridgit Gread)

Despite the desperate claims by John and yourself about my malice and my evil I have not told any lies here and as for your suggestion that I have been dishonest about when I started bloging, it was on the 15 of Nov 2005 and I have never claimed otherwise.
You on the other hand boast about your abilities as a liar and you still expect to be taken seriously as an arbiter of truth.
Even your claims about the evil that I have done are exaggerated beyond belief. So you deny being the author of “Bridgit Gread” so what? You also said that you are indifferent to the site yet you lead the chorus of vilification by all and sundry directed at me over that page.
So answer me this if you are as indifferent to the site as you claim why are trying so hard to prove to the entire hate chorus that it is NOT written by you?
The Happy Revolutionary (Thursday 29 November 2007, 9:13 pm) #

Hall, that site is yet more evidences of your unhinged stalking, and your confused ideas about TEH LEFT.
Nobody else on cyberspace but you has a beef with Bridgit as far as I’m aware. I find it hilarious that you would create such a site whilst at the same time claiming victim status as your Troll blog.
Bridgit Gread (Thursday 29 November 2007, 11:04 pm) #

Memo to Iain:

I am not Jeremy Sear; stop stalking me.

Kind regards,
Bridgit
Iain Hall (Thursday 29 November 2007, 11:22 pm) #

What’s up Hap are you missing the attention? I’ve had no contact from any Scotch fanciers yet but give them time and they will come…

Nobody else on cyberspace but you has a beef with Bridgit as far as I’m aware. I find it hilarious that you would create such a site whilst at the same time claiming victim status as your Troll blog.

The reality is that I can name at least one other who hates Bridgit more than I do, the name “David Tan” may not mean anything to you but it is usually enough to send a shiver down the spine of Bridgit Gread. Not that I’m saying that David is responsible because there are others and then there is even the possibility that Greado is herself responsible for the site anyway working on the old double bluff principle. You are just not in a position to make a definitive judgement one-way or the other.
You misunderstand the purpose of Troll tales and true. It is not to claim victim status at all but it is to show how vicious you lot all are and to take the piss out of your mock indignation, and bullshit claims to be fine moral and upstanding citizens and show the world that you are all hypocrites, The latest effort by your mate Bourbon boy is a good example of the hypocrisy that is the stock in trade of you all. He claims to have created a profile of me at a Gay dating site and he further claims that it is only the beginning of a campaign to harass me as long as Bridgit’s Blog continues to exist. Now just how does that stack up against me outing Jeremy Sear seven months after JF beck had already done just that? Or me embarrassing myself, by falling for Bridgit’s scam? Or even me NOT falling for Everett’s sock puppet? Or me saying that it would be possible to embarrass Mikey and yet not actually doing as much as checking which government offices there actually are in Canberra? Or even me Not taking up Fang’s suggestion that I should publish Sear’s address?
Can you see the pattern Here Hap?
I may have committed some misdemeanours in terms of blogging etiquette in late 2005 but I have always been mindful of the limits of ethical behaviour where as you lot have repeatedly acted without any concern for anything but trying to bully me on an ends justify the means principle..
Iain Hall (Thursday 29 November 2007, 11:34 pm) #

Memo to Iain:

I am not Jeremy Sear; stop stalking me.

Kind regards,
Bridgit

MEMO to “Bridgit Gread”
You are NOT a real person you are just an Internet persona created with a polemic purpose in mind and as such you are incapable of being “stalked”. Nor can you be defamed or slandered; they are offences that can only be perpetrated against real people, with real names and real addresses. In fact, in terms of the law “Bridgit Gread” has no standing at all.
The Happy Revolutionary (Thursday 29 November 2007, 11:36 pm) #

I may have committed some misdemeanours in terms of blogging etiquette in late 2005 but I have always been mindful of the limits of ethical behaviour where as you lot have repeatedly acted without any concern for anything but trying to bully me on an ends justify the means principle..

Again, hilarious.

I know perfectly well who David Tan is - he hasn’t been seen on the blogs in any one of his guises for some time. If I remember correctly, he actually announced his retirement from blogging some time ago, so that leaves you as the only person who is currently fixated with BG.

You misunderstand the purpose of Troll tales and true. It is not to claim victim status at all but it is to show how vicious you lot all are
Or, in other words, to claim victim status. Moron.

…take the piss out of your mock indignation, and bullshit claims to be fine moral and upstanding citizens and show the world that you are all hypocrites,

Ironically, none of the people you mention are anywhere near as puritanical as your good self. You’re the moralising twat who is forever pining for harsher sentences for crims, and bemoaning every social shift that has the slightest bit of enlightenment to it.

And what’s this about ‘Everett’s sock puppet’? Another spurious claim from a serial liar?

Not only have your demented views slipped from the moderate right to Alan Jones-esque garbage, you have continued a campaign of stalking and flamig at every opportunity. So take your hand off it when you bitch, moan and moralise about ‘hypocracy’.
Bruce (Friday 30 November 2007, 12:05 am) #

And what’s this about ‘Everett’s sock puppet’? Another spurious claim from a serial liar?

Spurious indeed. I’ve never used a sock puppet to bait Iain.

I wonder if Iain would care to prove otherwise, or again demonstrate his practice of accepting paranoid, vapid suspicions as grounds to make allegations.

For the record, I now recognise that Iain has claimed (not entertained a mere suspicion), in public, that I, a “real person” with a name, has used a sock puppet. He should ask AB about “due care for the truth”, he has practical experience. ;-)
Iain Hall (Friday 30 November 2007, 6:05 am) #

So are you denying posting as “Bruce 2007″ Everett?
Iain Hall (Friday 30 November 2007, 7:37 am) #

I know perfectly well who David Tan is - he hasn’t been seen on the blogs in any one of his guises for some time. If I remember correctly, he actually announced his retirement from blogging some time ago, so that leaves you as the only person who is currently fixated with BG.

I find that very hard to believe Hap You may have heard of the name but I don’t think you have any understanding of how much Greado hates David Tan or how mutual their hatred is. Changed his face, maybe, but retired from the blogosphere? Nah you are wrong.

…take the piss out of your mock indignation, and bullshit claims to be fine moral and upstanding citizens and show the world that you are all hypocrites,

Ironically, none of the people you mention are anywhere near as puritanical as your good self. You’re the moralising twat who is forever pining for harsher sentences for crims, and bemoaning every social shift that has the slightest bit of enlightenment to it.

I an very far from being at all puritanical, a term usually applied to pious protestant Christians, why I have repeatedly said that I support the notion that consenting adults should be free to do as they please with other consenting adults. I make no apology for believing that crime should be punished and not just “understood” but you are deluded if you think that every ”social shift”, as you call it, is necessarily good or the product of any kind of “enlightenment”. Some times such things have unforseen and very nasty consequences.
Hap you poor sour Commie do you really think that the left have a monopoly on virtue? That is a sure sign that you have not got a clue.

And what’s this about ‘Everett’s sock puppet’? Another spurious claim from a serial liar?

Hang on Hap Greado did not write the line you quote, for she is the one here who is a serial lair who boasts about it…
However I take on board Everett’s denial that MTL was his creation I will not make such claims again, until there is evidence.

Not only have your demented views slipped from the moderate right to Alan Jones-esque(sic) garbage, you have continued a campaign of stalking and flamig(sic) at every opportunity. So take your hand off it when you bitch, moan and moralise about ‘hypocracy’(sic).

Hap Maaate! Three errors in one sentence, what has happened to your being “a thousand times better” at the English language than Moi? Tut tut, not proof reading you comments eh?
For the record I am neither bitching nor moaning about the hypocrisy of you lot here but I am pointing it out and laughing at the suggestion from each minion here that you have any of the moral high ground.
The Happy Revolutionary (Friday 30 November 2007, 8:17 am) #

I find that very hard to believe Hap You may have heard of the name but I don’t think you have any understanding of how much Greado hates David Tan or how mutual their hatred is.

Nope, I read Boltwatch, and I remember the execrable Tan, trolling in his various guises. Perhaps you could enlighten us if you have information to suggest he’s blogging under another name.

Hap you poor sour Commie do you really think that the left have a monopoly on virtue? That is a sure sign that you have not got a clue.
But neither I, nor anybody here blogs about ‘virtue’. Mostly, they blog about politics, which is a different matter altogether.
The obsession is virtue is yours alone, Hall, and further evidence of the moralising drone you bring to every thread.

Hap Maaate! Three errors in one sentence, what has happened to your being “a thousand times better” at the English language than Moi? Tut tut, not proof reading you comments eh?
No, I don’t proofread comments, and I fire them off a lot faster than you do yours. Also, my errors are mere typos (which in some cases aren’t typos, except using the Word dictionary).
Your ‘prose’, on the other hand, is an assault against the language. For the most part, your posts are little different to the marks a retarded chimp could make with excrement on paper.
Bridgit Gread (Friday 30 November 2007, 9:11 am) #

LOL, “It’s David Tan! It’s David Tan!” he says, in a pathetic attempt at blame-shifting. As sour and disagreeable as he was, ‘David Tan’ was a low-altitude flier who could barely muster the effort to write a post of six lines, let alone construct a blog. Unlike a particular character in ’sunny Queensland’ who spends most of his day patrolling the Internet and has more blogs than brain cells.

And Iain, throw away the garage-sale lawbooks - you are still stalking me and I’m not interested in your advances (I’ve seen your picture, after all).
Agent Starling (Friday 30 November 2007, 10:03 am) #

Unlike a particular character in ’sunny Queensland’ who spends most of his day patrolling the Internet and has more blogs than brain cells.

This is the funniest description of Iain I have read in a while, touché. Many Thanks.

And Iain, throw away the garage-sale lawbooks

Fair go Bridget, he did steal them from a tip after all.

*Keeping posting Iain, it’s a quite day at the office and we need a laugh.
Iain Hall (Friday 30 November 2007, 10:43 am) #

Nope, I read Boltwatch, and I remember the execrable Tan, trolling in his various guises. Perhaps you could enlighten us if you have information to suggest he’s blogging under another name.

Now that would be telling tales Hap, something I won’t do. However I ask you just how long you have been a fan of Boltwatch?

But neither I, nor anybody here blogs about ‘virtue’. Mostly, they blog about politics, which is a different matter altogether.
The obsession is virtue is yours alone, Hall, and further evidence of the moralising drone you bring to every thread.

Bollocks Hap, all politics is about the virtue and vice (however you wish to define it) of the actions and plans of others and ourselves. This thread is about the veracity of attributions of authorship for the Bridgit Gread blog, and the morality of its creation. They are ethical questions, and all of you here are trying to suggest that your opinions are the ones that are both right and therefore virtuous. On this thread it is in fact you lot who are moralising, and laying the blame at my feet on the scantiest evidence, all of it circumstantial, that would not last two minutes in a court of law.

No, I don’t proofread comments, and I fire them off a lot faster than you do yours. Also, my errors are mere typos (which in some cases aren’t typos, except using the Word dictionary).
Your ‘prose’, on the other hand, is an assault against the language. For the most part, your posts are little different to the marks a retarded chimp could make with excrement on paper.

You have used this pathetic excuse “ they are only typos” before. It was inadequate then and it is inadequate now. Simply because when someone is” one thousand times better “ than Moi you have to make virtually no mistakes at all. You are just a blow hard braggart making pathetic excuses rather than admitting you are human, like the rests of us. Unlike you I am fairly modest about my prose it may not be perfect but then I don’t claim that it is. However you have so many tickets on yourself that you would not need a burqa to completely conceal your person from public view.

Bridgit Gread (Friday 30 November 2007, 9:11 am) #
LOL, “It’s David Tan! It’s David Tan!” he says, in a pathetic attempt at blame-shifting. As sour and disagreeable as he was, ‘David Tan’ was a low-altitude flier who could barely muster the effort to write a post of six lines, let alone construct a blog. Unlike a particular character in ’sunny Queensland’ who spends most of his day patrolling the Internet and has more blogs than brain cells.

Read my comment again Bridgit, I specifically say that I am not claiming that David is responsible at all, instead I cite him because Hap claims that no one else hates you enough to bother.

Then there are also all the Blairites who hate you as well from your days trolling as “Emily Patterson” any one of them could hate you enough to bother. I note a distinct lack of a denial from you that the whole thing has been some sort of double bluff on your part as well, and I wonder why you won’t deny that?

And Iain, throw away the garage-sale lawbooks - you are still stalking me and I’m not interested in your advances (I’ve seen your picture, after all).

I suggest you consult some of your employer’s legal people about the claims that I have made regarding the stalking, defamation and slander of a fictional character such as yourself. I would be very surprised indeed if they support your contention here.
There you go a topic for your next post, and it would make interesting reading.

Finally are you still as indifferent about that blog as you initially claimed you are?
Iain Hall (Friday 30 November 2007, 10:48 am) #

*Keeping posting Iain, it’s a quite day at the office and we need a laugh.

Stealing the boss’s time and his internet access then AS(S)?
Agent Starling (Friday 30 November 2007, 11:08 am) #

I am the boss Iain. Do you want my phone # so you can dob me into myself for using my internet connection that I am paying for?

I have a job/run my own business Iain unlike you who using tax payer’s funds and your wife’s income to fund your internet access. Can you see the folly of your hypocrisy? Probably not since you lose every single argument that you are in through your own incompetence.

Brdiget is not a liar or deceiver, you are. And the evidence is all over the net. Do you notice that no one is supporting your redundant argument or accusations?

Thanks for the laughs joy-boy.
Bridgit Gread (Friday 30 November 2007, 2:16 pm) #

Finally are you still as indifferent about that blog as you initially claimed you are?

I’m as indifferent to it as you are to holding down a job, Iain old son.

I note a distinct lack of a denial from you that the whole thing has been some sort of double bluff on your part as well

Iain, it’s not my blog - as you well know, since it’s actually yours.
Krypto (Friday 30 November 2007, 4:47 pm) #

[sung to “camptown racetrack” Krypto plays banjo while rocking in a chair on the porch, wheatsheaf protruding from his mouth while wearing overalls and a rough edged straw bota]

oh ian hall got thumped again doo dah doo dah
we all know he’s really David Tan oh de doo dah dey
he’s gonna blog all day, gonna blog all night
sold his soul to the “bolt watch man”
‘cos his blogs are shite

oh ian’s blog’s a roll of shame doo dah doo dah
can’t even spell his own first name oh de doo dah dey
he drives a noddy car
looks like it won’t get him far
it’s sponsored by centrelink
oh de doo dah dey
Bridgit Gread (Friday 30 November 2007, 6:06 pm) #

Watch out for the Hall logic, Krypto…

Bourbon Boy writes Iain Hall songs
Kryptosporidian also writes Iain Hall songs
Therefore, Kryptosporidian = Bourbon Boy
Krypto (Friday 30 November 2007, 8:25 pm) #

oh maybe I am Bourbon Boy Bridg, in this crazy ‘ol world who can tell what’s what?
Krypto hates ;;; ;;;;, Bridgit Gread hates ;;; ;;;;, maybe I’m you? Who knows?
Krypto (Friday 30 November 2007, 8:39 pm) #

funny how you never see me and Ed. in the same room together too innit?
Krypto (Friday 30 November 2007, 8:40 pm) #

“Ich Bin Einer Bruce”.
Krypto (Friday 30 November 2007, 8:44 pm) #

and what is John’s Surname? maybe it’s kryptosporidian!!!!
Bruce (Friday 30 November 2007, 9:45 pm) #

“Ich Bin Einer Bruce”.

Just a tip, I you should be careful not to enter my your own name when I you pose as a sock puppet. I’ve seen people accidentally enter their own name pretending to be someone else, and it’s embarrassing.

Four posts under the name of Krypto. It’s like “Krypto, sock puppet of Krypto”. ;-)
John Surname (Friday 30 November 2007, 11:29 pm) #

Maybe we should finally all admit we’re really just one person?
Bruce (Saturday 1 December 2007, 3:02 am) #

We? Oh, yeah, we! We, plural. Right! *wink*

We (”nudge, nudge, wink, wink”, said the blind man to the bat) are all a leftist collective after all. Perhaps our gestalt nature has been exposed!
Krypto (Saturday 1 December 2007, 3:07 pm) #

damn, I can’t remember who I’m supposed to be now.
templemonkey (Tuesday 18 December 2007, 9:17 am) #

Oh well,

Iain’s attention span has been reached and he is no longer updating the faux blog.

Hopefully now he will do a decent thing and delete it (doing ‘the decent thing’ would involve apologising for it but I can’t see that happening)
THR (Sunday 13 April 2008, 3:12 am) #

This is a pretty funny thread.
Angus McEarbang (Sunday 13 April 2008, 9:18 am) #

You laugh in the face of greatness. You will never be a blogging God like Ia;n Ha;;