Get of the grass… to sum up the politicians, if an AG/Cer said… if you plug your shaver into a chook it will power up, they’d issue a “Senate report saying just that.” I don’t know what you do, but I bloody well do read Hansard, reports, and etc. I’ll sum up the level of science, economics, and other matters besides: it’s child abuse.

I charge you, Grodscorp, of relying upon the singular fact: few have the time to attend to Parliament, even if only on the broadcast channel. Many, after a day in the office, except ” public servants’, are too buggered to have to put up with the rot of politicians.

Indeed, it is excruciating to listen too. It can be worthwhile. I’m not referring to MPI debates and Question time.

That Senate report has the scientific consistency of shite but, Grodscorp; you rely on two things:

1.Not many have time to actually scrutinise what the dumbed down dildos in Parliament actually bang on about.
2. Rather many believe the primitive beliefs in pseudo-rational dress of `environmentalism’ and ‘fossil fuels’ and ‘AGW/C-Change’.

Now, here’s the rub: there is a prize on offer for any fossil fuel booster to demonstrate the claim scientifically. So, why don’t the boosters grab it? It should be, if it is theoretically true, a shoe in.

Now as far as charlatans are concerned:
I’ll give you a list:

Sociologists
AGW/C-ers
Environmental scientists
Psychologists.

Now: In case you assume I am being a Luddite, I’ll time you, I’m preparing some careful articles on why they are charlatans.

I don’t pretend to be a known all – gnosticism is a heresy, but, since you are content to call me a charlatan, put up or shut up: You explain the above list is not the bilge of charlatans and without appeals such as x said so.
You produce an argument that is solid.

In the meantime, as you can gauge, I’m building up a few things, which aren’t pleasant but have to be dealt with.
I assume you’ve noted my notes on X and Y ‘ and what the Bracks Junta is doing deliberately to them. Unfortunately, they are not the only ones.

You know what really pisses me off, it’s not bunk purveyed as science, and it is why politicians and bureaucrats take it up. The sods plead their great ‘ consciences’ as they screw decent men ad women into the ground and, in Brackistaniland apply worse measures.

That is what the Senate report is for: to cover what it is they are about and I call it criminal fraud.

I don’t have time to piss around with twinkies, because right now, I’m busy in something bloodier than stupid Senate Reports produced by ignoramuses looking for any excuse to feed their fat faces.

So, GC put up a case or shut up.