Back in university I was torturously required to trawl through the writings of redeemed Maoist Keith Windschuttle, chiefly The Fabrication of Aboriginal History and The Killing of History. A summation of Keithy’s position is that history has, like, gone all left-wing and stuff, full of moral relativism and literary deconstruction and hermeneutics. Historians today – even really good ones like McIntyre and Simon Schama – are too lazy, too perverted by other disciplines, or just smoke lots of dope and make shit up. History should be about the facts, man, just like a science with lots of checking and double-checking and inscrutability of evidence. And because the intrepid white settlers who exiled, starved, poisoned and shot Aborigines in Tasmania didn’t write it all down, then none of it happened (kind of like Andy Bolt’s ‘name ten’ theory, only with bigger words).
Given Keith’s noble defence of fact-checking and meticulous attention to detail it was great to see him duped by a well-worded but factually baseless bit of pseudo-science, submitted to Quandrant, the conservative quarterly that Windschuttle edits. The piece claimed, amongst other things, that entire populations could be innoculated from malaria by genetically-programmed mosquitos. It referred to specific people, institutions and events but the theories and propositions it offered were bunk. Seems like Keith the rigorous checker and his sub-editing team were asleep at the wheel - not that you’d know it, reading Windschuttle’s retort, which still claims the moral high ground.
He’s not the only right-winger whose fact-checking is awry. This quote, attributed to Roman philospher Cicero in 55BC, has been doing the neo-con rounds for a while:
The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.
And don’t the kids love it. Amongst the comments at Crusader Ratbag, “…this message is so ancient…”, “and they say history doesn’t repeat itself” and “it’s always interesting reading commentary from generations ago”. Of course, it’s all bullshit. A debunking at Snopes concludes that:
- It’s unlike something that Cicero would say
- There are no intact writings from Cicero after 60BC
- The earliest mention of it comes in 1965 from a novellist, not a historian
When will teh Right get it right.