John Howard wins - the endorsement of most newspaper editorials today, that is:
Adelaide’s Sunday Mail:
Change for change’s sake is not a good enough reason to vote out a Government… The Sunday Mail believes the Coalition is best placed to govern Australia for the next three years.
Perth’s Sunday Times:
The Sunday Times believes change for change sake is simply not an adequate trigger to throw out a Coalition Government which, while far from perfect, has overseen record prosperity in WA and the nation.
Sydney’s Sunday Telegraph:
The Sunday Telegraph accepts readers believe it is finally time to give Labor a go. But Mr Rudd … must stare down a Labor cabinet inhabited by many with union and factional allegiances… The Sunday Telegraph advocates a vote for Labor, provided Mr Rudd give these assurances.
Melbourne’s Sunday Herald:
But why take the chance? Why change horses when Australia galloping strongly ahead with the lowest unemployment in a generation? … Australians should stick with Mr Howard.
Melbourne’s Sunday Age:
On the contenders’ “exposed form”,The Sunday Age does not see enough differences between the Coalition and Labor to urge readers to vote for one over the other.
(Those missing are ones I can’t yet find.)
This verdict is interesting because, among other things, it isn’t commone (sic) for newspapers to advocate a vote for the underdog. We like to back winners. Another reason this is interesting is the Rudd hasn’t even been able to get the support of the Sunday Age.
Surprise, surprise. Every single one of Rupert Murdoch’s flying monkey newspaper editors has endorsed John Howard. Total coincidence, I’m sure. And let’s just have a look at that “endorsement” from the Fairfaix Sunday Age again