There was this girl, right. John Surname met her and told me she was a solid four star tap. Impressed, I asked Craig — who had also met this girl — for his opinion, and he awarded a solid no tap.

How can this be? Can two red-blooded males (well, one red-blooded and one slightly pink-blooded — I’ll let you decide which is which) score the same girl so incredibly differently and both be telling the truth? Is this normal? Does it indicate a problem with men, with the tapology theory, or both?

For the record, I reckon she’s a two star tap.

Here at GrodsCorp we’re often asked what we’re on about when we make comments that simply contain the word “tap”. The science of tapology is mysterious so the other night when Craig and I were at a pub with cause to drink numerous glasses of scotch we sketched out the following flow chart.

If it can’t be flowcharted it’s not worth knowing

After discussions with most of the GrodsTeam at the GrodsThink record last night, and taking into account some minor alterations, I’ve hereby codified the theory of Tapology and made it official. I hope this chart clears things up for all GrodsReaders — perhaps consider printing it out and putting it in your wallet.

You obviously start with “boy” or “girl” depending on your personal tap preference

The Editor, John Surname, Ant Rogenous, Jermey Sear, Chuck A. Spear, Keri and Craig discuss:

* IR laws and cheap populism
* Roberta Williams’ tits
* Political tapology
* Funniest/weirdest things on the intertubes this week

** Because everyone in the world is currently downloading other podcasts that aren’t this one, use only the “Play in popup” link or the “Download” link. **

 

 GrodsThink 21 (17 June 08) [34:54m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Subscribe: